ગુરુવાર, 28 નવેમ્બર, 2019
શુક્રવાર, 18 મે, 2018
શનિવાર, 3 ઑક્ટોબર, 2015
જુનાગઢ જીલ્લાના તમામ ગામડાઓ તથા શહેરોની જંત્રીના ભાવો
અહી નીચે દર્શાવેલ ફાઇલમાં જુનાગઢ જીલ્લાના તમામ ગામડાઓ તથા શહેરોની જંત્રીના ભાવો જોવા મળશે જે તમને તમામ દસ્તાવેજી પ્રક્રિયા માટે મદદરૂ૫ થશે.
ફાઇલ ડાઉનલોડ કરવા અહી કલીક કરો.
ફાઇલ ડાઉનલોડ કરવા અહી કલીક કરો.
ફાઇલ ડાઉનલોડ કરવા અહી કલીક કરો.
ફાઇલ ડાઉનલોડ કરવા અહી કલીક કરો.
સોમવાર, 25 મે, 2015
A gift can't be taken back: SC
The Supreme Court bench of Justices S B Sinha and H S Bedi, ruled that
gifts from parents to children could not be rescinded later had said two
months ago that parents could disentitle their son from inheritance if
he neglected them. Ashokan from Kerala was gifted land by his mother
through a registered gift deed out of “love and affection” on January 4,
1984. His father followed suit saying it would help him lead a good
family life. But after one-and-a-half years, the parents cancelled the
deeds saying Ashokan had failed to render financial assistance to the
family though he worked in Oman. They were also upset he did not fulfil
his promise to contribute Rs 1 lakh for his sister’s marriage.
Ashokan approached the trial court seeking quashing of the two
documents executed by his parents through which the gift was cancelled.
Despite the breach of promise cited by the parents, the court ruled that
once the gift deed had been executed, it could not be revoked “by the
mere fact that the donor’s feeling towards the recipient underwent a
change”.
The parents had protested that if the deeds were kept alive, it would
be fair to fear that the son would evict them from their own land. The district
court ruled in favour of the parents saying the son had not taken
possession of the land, nor paid tax, nor mutated it in his name. The
Kerala HC upheld this decision.
Ashokan approached the SC challenging the HC’s decision. The SC said
the gift deeds were executed out of love and on the ground that the
recipient was the son of the donor and to enable him to live a good
life.
“Could the parents now turn around and say he was to fulfil a promise?
The answer must be in the negative. It’s one thing to say the execution
of the deed is based on an aspiration or belief, but another to say the
same constituted an onerous gift,” said the bench. The SC revived the
gift deeds originally made by the parents and said, “Once a gift is
complete, it cannot be rescinded.”
